Moderators: Ed, betty boop, Gazjen


Ed wrote:Capn Jack wrote: Very big ship engines only rev to 800rpm....![]()
Very very big ship engines only run to 100 rpm


markanddawn wrote:335d??


markanddawn wrote:Yep, I'd love to chip mine although it voids warranty. If I owned it I would but it's a company car
You can have 1 point as I knew you'd go for 335d![]()
Not as quick as your RS though





Gazjen wrote:Ed wrote:Capn Jack wrote: Very big ship engines only rev to 800rpm....![]()
Very very big ship engines only run to 100 rpm
Yes but they have a variable pitch prop, the engine speed stays constant.
The only real answer ask for a sea trial in both and see if you can live with the diesel as already stated it will be cheaper to run and safer, If you do that make sure you report back!

Gazjen wrote:It was £1.20 per l for diesel at the pump at cobbs while we were there (5,6,7th Aug)
They have already put the duty up on red diesel there is some kind of percentage for what's allowed to be brought for heating (They can't charge duty on it when used for heating) against fuel for propulsion, I believe it was around 70-30 % and most sell at this combined rate, on the river network anyway. There was talk at the time of my fathers tank at the front (For his Diesel stove) getting a lot bigger and accidentally feeding the rear tank


Centaur wrote:From the CMD stats, the VW motor will produce between 400Nm & 450Nm between 1,500-4,000rpm. The 350MAG will produce around 50Nm more across this range and hence will feel slightly more powerful. Furthermore, the 350MAG can rev to 4,800rpm, producing an additional 75hp, and will therefore have a significant top speed advantage.
The diesel will be best suited to steady running at relatively low cruising speeds. However, fuel consumption at low speed with the petrol motor will not be too horrific either so, unless you do significantly more than the average 50 hours / annum, you will not save a great deal of money on fuel. For most owners, the huge list-price premium usually placed on diesels over petrol motors, as JoridaPilot mentioned, simply outweighs the savings on boats up to and around 25'.
Bear in mind also that sports boats are often purchased for their performance rather than their cruising ability. The relatively modest performance of most diesel powered sports boats limits their appeal and therefore, unlike larger cruisers, they tend to suffer greater initial depreciation.


Matt13 wrote:
Thanks for the advice Centaur and to all the others. Its been really helpful. Im pretty much decided now on petrol and am pretty sure which boat I would like. There is a 25' and 28' version, I could get the 28' one at the same price but slightly older. Thing is 28' even 25' is going to feel massive after my current boat!

markanddawn wrote:Matt13 wrote:
Thanks for the advice Centaur and to all the others. Its been really helpful. Im pretty much decided now on petrol and am pretty sure which boat I would like. There is a 25' and 28' version, I could get the 28' one at the same price but slightly older. Thing is 28' even 25' is going to feel massive after my current boat!
1) What is the age difference
The larger ones on the market at the same price only seem to be a couple of years older than the 25 footers
2) Are they in equally good condition/hours/service history/spec
This is something I will check when I come to view
3) What boat(s) are you looking at.
That would be telling wouldnt it and where would the surprise be!?
Go for 28', you'll wish you had once you're used to the 25 footer. It may prevent you needing to upgarde further for a while longer?


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest